The Naturalistic evolution theory (or unguided evolution) posits the view that new species of life came into being as a result of natural causes only, that is, without any supernatural intervention (compare Creationism). Put this way, it makes a crucial distinction between the more general or vague formulations espoused by proponents of Evolution.

Evolutionists frequently claim that they are not atheists or materialists, and even that evolution is compatible with religious faith. However, this claim rests on an ambiguity (most likely a deliberately framed one). The term unguided evolution cuts through this fog.

The primary claim of Evolution is that human beings "have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life". The secondary claim is that science can explain this process satisfactorily in terms of natural forces and processes.

When evolutionsts say that someone "believes in evolution", they imply that the person accepts both the primary and and the secondary claim. However, surveys such as the March 2001 Gallup Poll [1] show that this is an enormous exaggeration. The reason they get away with this is that the term Creationist is ambiguous.

Naturalistic evolution and Creationism

Young Earth Creationism is the belief that "God created human beings in their present form at one time in last 6,000 years ". However, there is another "creationist" idea, Old Earth Creationism, which states that God's creative process for life on earth took millions of years.

About 15% of Americans believe in unguided evolution, while 80% reject it and 5% have no opinion. [2]

  • These numbers shows that skepticism that life developed via purely unguided evolutionary processes remains very high. [3]

Naturalistic evolution and Theistic evolution

Naturalistic evolution may be contrasted with Theistic evolution which suggests that evolution happened but was guided by God to produce mankind.


Many evolutionists object to the term unguided evolution on the ground that the Theory of Evolution is a scientific theory which is concerned only with naturalistic causes and makes no reference to "guidance" other than the guiding effect of Natural selection.


The concept of unguided evolution is important in the legal debates over evolution education in U.S. public schools. Evolutionists generally argue that evolution should be taught as a "fact" and without any discussion of whether it has been "guided" or not.

US Polls

Poll results vary.

  • 9-12%: Humans developed, but God had no part in process. [4]
  • 18%: evolution took place without God playing a role (just teens polled) [5]

"Human beings have evolved, but God had no part in the process." [6]

  • All: 12%
  • Men: 17%
  • Women: 8%


  2. Humans developed, with God guiding (37%). God created humans in present form (45%). 37 + 45 = 82. [1]
This page uses content from Conservapedia. The original article was at Naturalistic evolution. The list of authors can be seen in the page history. Conservapedia grants a non-exclusive license for you to use any of its content (other than images) on this site, with or without attribution. Read more about Conservapedia copyrights.

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.